Thread: Life vs Photo
View Single Post
Old 05-19-2008, 09:23 PM   #1
Marvin Mattelson Marvin Mattelson is offline
SOG Member
FT Professional
'04 Merit Award PSA
'04 Best Portfolio PSA
'03 Honors Artists Magazine
'01 Second Prize ASOPA
Perm. Collection- Ntl. Portrait Gallery
Perm. Collection- Met
Leads Workshops
 
Marvin Mattelson's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2002
Location: Great Neck, NY
Posts: 1,093
Life vs Photo

Assuming that a portrait created from photo reference is intrinsically inferior to one painted from life is putting the responsibility on the process rather than the artist. If only it were that simple. You can paint from life until the next millennium and never do anything worthwhile.

I've seen incredible paintings done from life and beautiful paintings done from photos too. However, the vast majority of portraits I've seen are poorly thought out and ineptly handled regardless of whether from life or photo reference.

I believe that injecting the quality of life into a painting comes from the artist's heart, intent, knowledge and talent. Painting from life involves knowing what to look for in order to bring it to life.

I work from a combination of photos and life sittings. I say, why not get the best of both worlds.
__________________
Marvin Mattelson
http://www.fineartportrait.com
[email protected]
  Reply With Quote