Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Peter Dransfield
In practice this is a rather wide church ranging from Marvin to Thomasin passing via Debra and Ilaria. Many different styles responding to very different aesthetics and that is the way it should be with artists challenging and stimulating each other. Trying to quash discussion by chanting 'traditional portrait site' is pointless.
|
MY!.. but I am flattered to be visible here......
Have you raised any specific artistic points?
This is one of those arguments, that seems to come up to test the right to argue. Have you really been stopped from posting anything yet? Can you show us the Rottie scars? It seems you are dancing around two issues. Either you do have something so say and are laying the groundwork for indignation if it is not welcomed with open arms.....or simply agitating for the sake of agitation.
Tasteful - ON THIS SITE - will be judged by the owner. In other fora I have likened it to being invited to a persons home for tea and popping a Bud, stripping to your shorts and putting your feet on the table to watch football. We are all guests.
It is sort of presumptuous of you to assume things will be censored before you speak them. If I am aggressive, by simply reading the contract I signed when I joined the site and answering the questions I hear you asking, then I will honestly give you an opinion: (based on the evidence I see in the site) this looks a wee bit paranoiac. Nothing personal, but what is the stink? You seem to be speaking up a storm, and quite freely, you have not been denied this ability. You have neither posted or even linked to these impending abominations - what is the actual problem?