View Single Post
Old 10-22-2008, 11:17 AM   #2
Alexandra Tyng Alexandra Tyng is offline
UNVEILINGS MODERATOR
Juried Member
 
Alexandra Tyng's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2005
Location: Narberth, PA
Posts: 2,485
I thought the article looked at the issue from different sides and presented a relatively unbiased view of the subject, considering that the readership is the general public. It is easy to see how people would question spending what seem to be large outlays of money for portraits when photographs are available. Art is considered a luxury by many, even by the same people who appreciate it and are inspired by it. So in these tough economic times, the issue of money is bound to be raised.

I noticed a couple of issues that the writer was probably unaware of. One is that, as younger and talented artists come into the market, prices become competitive. This happens repeatedly in waves. I would imagine that those at the "top" of the field financially would enjoy riding the crest of the wave for a while--until it breaks and a new wave comes along. Once the new artists flood the market with high quality art, people catch on and it is harder and harder for the "top" artists to get commissions at a very high price. It's just the way of the world. I think it is easy for artists to out-price themselves if they think things are always going to be the same or better. So some of the price confusion that was discussed in the article relates to this, and that is why there is disagreement over the definition of a "cheap" portrait. Some people care about reputation and quality, others about reputation only, and others care more about getting high quality for less money.

The other issue I noticed, reading between the lines, is a lack of understanding of how artists are commissioned vs. how government jobs are awarded. Reading the article, someone might get the impression that something fishy was going on, that artists were being awarded favors, because no bidding had occurred! I thought this was amusing, but a little frustrating, too, because the author of the article didn't take the time to explain how art is commissioned.

It was really nice to see Joy Thomas mentioned, and Michele Rushworth (though not by name). There were a few other familiar names, and maybe other forum members, too. Exciting!
  Reply With Quote