Portrait Artist Forum    

Go Back   Portrait Artist Forum > Cafe Guerbois Discussions - Moderator: Michele Rushworth
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Topic Tools Search this Topic Display Modes
Old 06-10-2004, 08:15 PM   #1
Julie Deane Julie Deane is offline
Juried Member
 
Julie Deane's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Location: Gainesville, GA
Posts: 1,298
The tight finish vs......




I've been hanging around the SOG for a while now, as well as perusing numerous magazines having to do with portraits, and I'm intrigued by something. It appears that the most popular portraits by far are the ultra-finished pieces. They usually win the big prizes. Yet, go back a generation or so, and less finished pieces were "in". I
__________________
Julie Deane
www.discerningeyeportraits.com
Member of Merit, Portrait Society of Atlanta
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2004, 11:16 PM   #2
Michele Rushworth Michele Rushworth is offline
CAFE & BUSINESS MODERATOR
SOG Member
FT Professional
 
Michele Rushworth's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,460
My clients seem to prefer a high level of finish. The highest compliment (in their minds) is, "Ooooh, it looks just like a photograph.' Actually I'm trying for something better than a photograph, but that's another story.
__________________
Michele Rushworth
www.michelerushworth.com
[email protected]
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2004, 11:01 AM   #3
David Bottoni David Bottoni is offline
Juried Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 50
I believe the pendulum swings in accordance to society's weariness of a particular style of painting that has overstayed its welcome and it then becomes the appreciation of an art style that differs from the style at the time. Eventually, every style becomes 'passe', but realism or high realism, will always come in and out of fashion due to its aesthetic and technical appeal as well as the indelible truth found in most works of art. I personally prefer a 'tight finish', but as Michelle mentioned, the client is always impressed with high realism, and who can argue with a paying client? If you are talking about art critics, well, that's a whole other topic.

David
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2004, 02:11 PM   #4
Stanka Kordic Stanka Kordic is offline
SOG Member
FT Professional
 
Stanka Kordic's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Location: Cleveland Heights, OH
Posts: 184
I am hired for my looseness. My tendency is to cringe when I'm told "it looks like a photograph" (out comes more paint). The important thing I've learned is that when you follow your heart, the clients will come...

~stanka
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2004, 02:29 PM   #5
Marvin Mattelson Marvin Mattelson is offline
SOG Member
FT Professional
'04 Merit Award PSA
'04 Best Portfolio PSA
'03 Honors Artists Magazine
'01 Second Prize ASOPA
Perm. Collection- Ntl. Portrait Gallery
Perm. Collection- Met
Leads Workshops
 
Marvin Mattelson's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2002
Location: Great Neck, NY
Posts: 1,093
I think the point of debating tight vs loose is missing the boat entirely. Far too many are seduced by the finish when the underlying structure is what makes a painting good is immensely more critical. I see far to many aspiring painters trying to copy the surface effects of artists they want to emulate with no understanding as to why those particular paintings work.

To me, it is like trying to pick out an umbrella according to the color of the fabric.

I believe that good painting will always outsell trendiness, in the long run. We should therefore be true to ourselves and not try to second guess the fashion of the moment.
__________________
Marvin Mattelson
http://www.fineartportrait.com
[email protected]
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2004, 08:24 PM   #6
Julie Deane Julie Deane is offline
Juried Member
 
Julie Deane's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Location: Gainesville, GA
Posts: 1,298
It's not really a debate....

Hi Marvin -

This is certainly not meant to be a debate. I just think the style shift that appears to be happening is interesting and thought I would open it up to comment. I agree that it is the content of a painting that makes it or breaks it, whatever the style.
__________________
Julie Deane
www.discerningeyeportraits.com
Member of Merit, Portrait Society of Atlanta
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing this Topic: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Topics
Thread Topic Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Final varnish - matte or gloss Jeff Morrow Conservation & Restoration 33 01-09-2005 03:14 PM
Photo Finish Spray Lacquer Lara Cannon Paints, Mediums, Brushes & Grounds 12 03-07-2004 03:05 PM
Pastor van Horne Scott Bartner Portrait Unveilings, All Medium- Moderators: A. Tyng & C. Saper 6 11-25-2003 02:25 PM
Guilty Pleasures Tom Edgerton Cafe Guerbois Discussions - Moderator: Michele Rushworth 24 08-30-2003 02:08 PM
Linen: Loose & Tight Mike Dodson Paints, Mediums, Brushes & Grounds 10 08-21-2003 05:12 PM

 

Make a Donation



Support the Forum by making a donation or ordering on Amazon through our search or book links..







All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.