 |
04-22-2004, 04:51 PM
|
#1
|
Juried Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Location: Hanford, CA
Posts: 163
|
Curious question, in the middle of all of this wonderful information on tranferring images, why is it that no matter what "tool" we use, even when it's not strictly "tracing" anything (which, I know is a WHOLE other debate) do people STILL think that it's "cheating"?
I mean, I just heard from two friends that were over in my studio today who said that "even taking measurements is cheating - not that it's bad - it's still not FREEHAND." OK., dumb statement, sure...but WHY, WHY, WHY does this exist in our society at all?!!
Were there THAT many kids who got their knuckles rapped, or at least, embarrassed in front of the whole class for putting a piece of paper in front of a picture to trace the image on? I mean, REALLY? We all know, that you can take 24 people, any age, and give them tracing paper, a picture and pencils/paint, and you will end up with 20 - 23 pieces that will be barely recognizable as the original image. Am I right about it?!
Gear
|
|
|
04-22-2004, 05:44 PM
|
#2
|
Juried Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Location: 8543-dk Hornslet, Denmark
Posts: 1,642
|
Hi Gear,
I admit ! I cheat !!
I use all my knowledge whenever I can. But for most of the times it is not enough.
When I am out in nature, making watercolors I measure with my brush and thumb, and in happy moments I can measure using only my eyes, simply by staring for a long time and then seeing the figure on my paper in reversed colors, but in the right, sight size, scale. Is that cheating?
When I do a complicated likeness from a small photo, I take measures to get the right proportions. OK I cheat, but only for a start.
I have never finished a painting only by cheating. I always have to get into the scene and live by the figure, understand it and feel it, before I can do anything of interest.
If cheating is all, I wonder why so few come up with results !
Gear, this is not meant for you, but you inspired me to do this conclusion.
Thanks Allan.
|
|
|
04-22-2004, 06:04 PM
|
#3
|
Juried Member
Joined: Feb 2003
Location: Centreville, AL
Posts: 306
|
Allan,
12"-15" sounds like a pretty optimal size to me. Mine are 8" and works great for taking an 8 x 10 up to a 16 x 20. As I mentioned earlier, I use center line cross hairs for reference so I don't need, say for example, a full 10" to draw a full size head. 5" on the large end would be enough. The 8" set I have will open comfortably to 10-3/8" on the largest end. I'll try to post a picture of the set I made tonight to give you an idea. I made mine out of hardwood dowels.
|
|
|
04-22-2004, 06:32 PM
|
#4
|
Juried Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Location: Hanford, CA
Posts: 163
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Allan Rahbek
If cheating is all, I wonder why so few come up with results !!!!!!!
Gear, this is not meant for you, but you inspired me to do this conclusion.
Thanks Allan.
|
No, no, no....no worries Alan. LOL.....I am TOTALLY feelin ya man. Keep it up, dude!
If Michelangelo had to use pounce patterns.....then dang it......I'm gonna use pouce patterns!
-geeDub
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing this Topic: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Topic Tools |
Search this Topic |
|
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:24 AM.
|