 |
02-18-2005, 02:10 AM
|
#1
|
BOARD ADVISOR SOG Member FT Professional
Joined: Sep 2001
Location: Provo, UT
Posts: 397
|
An old tramp stumbled into the studio during the session and insisted on spoiling a picture.
|
|
|
03-12-2005, 11:36 AM
|
#2
|
PAINTING PORTRAITS FROM LIFE MODERATOR FT Professional
Joined: Nov 2001
Location: Loveland, CO
Posts: 846
|
Bill:
These are great shots! I would love to hear more about the flash equipment. One thing I have considered is to start a topic where folks who have high-end digitals that can take RAW pics could post their settings.
I have a devil of a time taking shots of my paintings vs. taking shots of subjects.
|
|
|
04-16-2005, 08:38 AM
|
#3
|
Juried Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Location: Lincoln, NE
Posts: 260
|
Yes, Mr. Whitaker, I would like to hear a bit more about your light source. Is it actually a flash unit, or is it a light source us dummies could build?
Also, do you -- or anyone else -- have a few cogent comments about which digital camera does a good job at portrait photography?
The photo you showed from your studio and camera were great, I thought.
|
|
|
04-16-2005, 09:01 AM
|
#4
|
PHOTOGRAPHY MODERATOR SOG Member '03 Finalist Taos SOPA '03 HonMen SoCal ASOPA '03 Finalist SoCal ASOPA '04 Finalist Taos SOPA
Joined: Dec 2001
Location: Tulsa, Oklahoma
Posts: 2,674
|
Richard,
You might find that Bill answers many of your questions in this thread, "A Natalie Test":
http://forum.portraitartist.com/showthread.php?t=5418
I recommend any of the digital SLR's. I am biased toward the Nikon's but would accept any of the other major brand digital SLR's.
__________________
Mike McCarty
|
|
|
04-16-2005, 02:49 PM
|
#5
|
Juried Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Location: Lincoln, NE
Posts: 260
|
Mike:
Thanks for the thread. Sounds like it is quite a nice piece of equipment. Wonder if a guy could come anywhere near creating a similar thing on his own.
At the moment, I'm using tungsten light and Kodak Portra 100T film. Get good flesh tones with this film. Why couldn't a guy jury-rig a soft diffuser of some sort, or would that be necessary?
So far, I've heard good things about the Canon EOS 10D, and the Nikon D70.
|
|
|
04-16-2005, 03:19 PM
|
#6
|
PHOTOGRAPHY MODERATOR SOG Member '03 Finalist Taos SOPA '03 HonMen SoCal ASOPA '03 Finalist SoCal ASOPA '04 Finalist Taos SOPA
Joined: Dec 2001
Location: Tulsa, Oklahoma
Posts: 2,674
|
Quote:
Why couldn't a guy jury-rig a soft diffuser of some sort, or would that be necessary?
|
I think a clever fellow might get that done. I'm no good in that respect.
Although I admire these setups, and concede that they can offer great benefit, I tend to go with the natural light.
__________________
Mike McCarty
|
|
|
04-16-2005, 11:53 PM
|
#7
|
CAFE & BUSINESS MODERATOR SOG Member FT Professional
Joined: Jul 2001
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,460
|
I jury rigged a faux-soft box with two light stands, a $10 dome lightbulb housing and a $40 "Lite-disk" circular diffuser. The whole deal cost me under $100 and works fine.
That said, I always end up just using natural light when I do photo shoots.
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing this Topic: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Topic Tools |
Search this Topic |
|
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:22 PM.
|