 |
06-13-2006, 12:26 AM
|
#1
|
STUDIO & HISTORICAL MODERATOR
Joined: Apr 2002
Location: Southern Pines, NC
Posts: 487
|
Sorry, Alex, I was not very articulate, and as I haven't posted on a forum in quite some time, I forget my manners and my post does read like a manifesto. I'll try to remember that this is not my sketchbook.
I do mean to say that in relevant, timeless Art, the gender of the subject doesn't matter.
The Leonardo you posted is timeless and powerful - not because the sitter was a woman. Look at his drawings of landscapes, the weather, a copse of trees. It might not be fair to use your example because he is one of immortals. But honestly, in my favorites, both historical and contemporary, the gender of the subjects doesn't impact my response to the piece at all.
Kim, I only meant that historically, great figurative art is and remains independent of the taste of the patron. This is not to say I don't pine for the days of the truly loaded patronage of the Church, or the State or the Monarchy.
It is my understanding that we're not to post nudes in this section: should we splinter the topic and explore examples under life drawings? Marcus, are you familiar with Sargent's drawings of male nudes? Very ethereal, profound and beautiful things.
See, now I have to refresh my memory on how to post an image! Because I can think of so many paintings that blow me away no matter if the form is male or female.
And from my side of the easel, I've had mesmerizing models from both genders.
|
|
|
06-13-2006, 12:43 AM
|
#2
|
Juried Member Finalist, Int'l Salon 2006
Joined: Feb 2004
Location: Singapore
Posts: 324
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mari DeRuntz
Marcus, are you familiar with Sargent's drawings of male nudes? Very ethereal, profound and beautiful things...
...And from my side of the easel, I've had mesmerizing models from both genders...
|
Hi Mari, we may not have met before this thread, but i guess i found another soulmate, finding that "lady in the lake" quality about human figures!
Yes i've seen Sargent's male nudes, and happen to have his book on this. Looking at his draughtsmanship in general, i saw his ability to capture that "gentility amidst steelness" Taoist quality in his works - his ability to capture the essence of women. And having this ability he passed on the same quality onto his male nudes.
Off the thread discussion, i reckon it's this quality on his male nudes, that got a rumour that Sargent's got gay inclinations - if not he was a gay! Of course to me, that doesn't ring true to my opinion.
|
|
|
06-15-2006, 04:21 PM
|
#3
|
UNVEILINGS MODERATOR Juried Member
Joined: May 2005
Location: Narberth, PA
Posts: 2,485
|
 Richard
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mari DeRuntz
in relevant, timeless Art, the gender of the subject doesn't matter. . . .The Leonardo you posted is timeless and powerful - not because the sitter was a woman.
|
Mari, I couldn't agree with you more on this. I truly believe (and see with my own eyes) that art which stands the test of time is certainly not dependent on the gender of the subject to give it power.
I started this thread not to argue that point, but because I was wondering why I see much more new figurative work (and sometimes portraits that border on figurative) of the "lovely young woman" type. People come in all shapes and sizes, and I find a variety of people interesting to paint. I'm actually looking for individuality more than classic beauty.
I also started this thread because I was struck by the way that Andrew Wyeth painted Helga and Siri in secret, over and over. To him it was very important, even essential, to have the complete artistic freedom to do this, and these obviously were very intense experiences for him. Somehow he knew his wife would not react well to the secrecy, but she might not have liked knowing, either. Somehow, he managed to continue painting whomever he wants to paint. Many male artists I know use the same femal model over and over and this is accepted practice. If you reverse the roles, the picture looks different. I suspect women artists would be given a harder time for doing the same thing, or even for painting male models alone in her studio, etc. I personally would like to have total artistic freedom in this, I am determined to have it, but it is problematic.
|
|
|
06-15-2006, 09:32 PM
|
#4
|
STUDIO & HISTORICAL MODERATOR
Joined: Apr 2002
Location: Southern Pines, NC
Posts: 487
|
Alex, no response except a smile. There is so much relevancy to the issues you've raised that I'll attempt to gather my thoughts and be able to post some model stories along these lines by the time you return.
Bon Voyage!
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing this Topic: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:15 AM.
|