Portrait Artist Forum    

Go Back   Portrait Artist Forum > Methods of Seeing
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Topic Tools Search this Topic Display Modes
Old 10-24-2002, 11:03 AM   #1
Margaret Port Margaret Port is offline
Associate Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Location: Cairns, Australia
Posts: 98
The eyes are all important




Many years ago, I attended a sculpture workshop with a French artist called Frederick Chepeaux, who was a most beautiful portrait sculptor. He used eye size as a measurement for all facial proportions.

I use the same method when life drawing. I don't rigidly adhere to the measurements but they are very useful tool for checking likeness.

Using a serious face full on as my example, the widest part of the face is the eye level. 5 eyes wide. The nose is 1 eye wide.

The space between the base of the nose and the upper lip is 1 eye height. The lips are 1 eye height. The bottom lip to the chin is 1 eye long.

The upper base (where it attaches) of the ear lines up with the eye line, the lower base of the ear lines with the nose. The corners of the mouth (in repose) are directly in line with the pupils.

He had a similar method for figure measurement where he used the head height and width to give the proportions of the whole body but I haven't remembered that so well.

He had reference books on his methods. Perhaps someone else has heard of them.
__________________
Margaret Port
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2002, 11:26 AM   #2
Steven Sweeney Steven Sweeney is offline
Juried Member
PT 5+ years
 
Steven Sweeney's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Location: Stillwater, MN
Posts: 1,801
I've read of this eye measurement methodology. Too hard for me to keep up with, and those diagrams of a full figures surveyed with eyes all over the figure -- it seemed too weird. Anyway, I absolutely defy anyone here to accurately measure an eye's width and transcribe it elsewhere, much less over and over. The only eye's width I've ever found practical is -- in the eyes, of course -- and then between the eyes.

The thing I love about Daniel Greene's instructional videos is that he sets up the anatomical proportions as a presumption. He's seen the archetype so many times, he knows what to expect. But THEN, he checks his assumptions against the model, and if the archetypical landmarks are WRONG this time, he changes them. Greene's methodology can carve hours, days or weeks off the wretching that goes into getting started, much less getting a likeness.
__________________
Steven Sweeney
[email protected]

"You must be present to win."
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2002, 12:20 PM   #3
Michael Georges Michael Georges is offline
PAINTING PORTRAITS
FROM LIFE MODERATOR

FT Professional
 
Michael Georges's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Location: Loveland, CO
Posts: 846
Steven: I agree about Greene's ability to draw the base proportions and then modify them to fit the subject's individual landmarks. I have a video of his where the initial drawing with paint looks a lot like a comic book illustration - he refines it from there and the end result is great. I just cannot get into mixing all those colors!
__________________
Michael Georges
www.fineportraitsinoil.com
Michael's Life Drawing & Painting Blog

Regular and consistent work from life will improve your portraits.
Drawing skills are the foundation of all an artist does.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing this Topic: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

 

Make a Donation



Support the Forum by making a donation or ordering on Amazon through our search or book links..







All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.