 |
|
09-13-2004, 07:10 PM
|
#1
|
PHOTOGRAPHY MODERATOR SOG Member '03 Finalist Taos SOPA '03 HonMen SoCal ASOPA '03 Finalist SoCal ASOPA '04 Finalist Taos SOPA
Joined: Dec 2001
Location: Tulsa, Oklahoma
Posts: 2,674
|
Would anyone like to offer some advice regarding the re-shooting of this image?
The colors are so strong, they influence and reflect onto all that come near them. Even if you brought in some auxiliary front lighting, which I think you might want to do, I don't think you could get around the strong effect these colors would have.
I suppose you could just deal with it in black and white and introduce your own colors.
__________________
Mike McCarty
|
|
|
09-14-2004, 12:02 PM
|
#2
|
Juried Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Location: 8543-dk Hornslet, Denmark
Posts: 1,642
|
Hi Mike,
I am going to make a wild guess on what to do. Could it be that the D70 could not handle the big difference in light, coming from the window, and the softer light in the room.
I would try at a later time a day, so maybe the sunlight is coming more from the window, that we don
|
|
|
09-14-2004, 03:51 PM
|
#3
|
PHOTOGRAPHY MODERATOR SOG Member '03 Finalist Taos SOPA '03 HonMen SoCal ASOPA '03 Finalist SoCal ASOPA '04 Finalist Taos SOPA
Joined: Dec 2001
Location: Tulsa, Oklahoma
Posts: 2,674
|
Allan,
That's some pretty good thinking. The large door windows were facing due east at about 11:00 AM with a full sun day.
In the afternoon on a cloudy day might just do the trick. I'm sure I did spot metering but the light was just too intense and it turned those colors electric.
I may not get to redo with these gals but it's a good learning
experience.
These two person compositions are not so easy. I thought I had something going here but I'm put off by the elbow.
In the next shot notice how much reflected red this gal got on her nose and upper lip.
__________________
Mike McCarty
|
|
|
09-14-2004, 04:16 PM
|
#4
|
PHOTOGRAPHY MODERATOR SOG Member '03 Finalist Taos SOPA '03 HonMen SoCal ASOPA '03 Finalist SoCal ASOPA '04 Finalist Taos SOPA
Joined: Dec 2001
Location: Tulsa, Oklahoma
Posts: 2,674
|
Here are two young girls by Bouguereau called "Hazelnuts."
And then one more two person composition by W.B., which will no doubt be forthcoming for these girls.
__________________
Mike McCarty
|
|
|
09-14-2004, 04:26 PM
|
#5
|
SOG Member '02 Finalist, PSA '01 Merit Award, PSA '99 Finalist, PSA
Joined: Jul 2001
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 819
|
Mike--
Regarding the one in question with strong colors, I don't think it's just colors reflecting off of the environment. It looks like a classic case of using daylight film when the predominant light is tungsten--if it were film (I realize it's not). Would your digital camera be keying off of the window somehow unintentionally?
If the camera was set for warm tungsten light, the window would read bluer, I'd guess.
I just find it hard to believe that all of the contamination on the girls is reflected color bouncing onto them. I've been wrong before, but it looks like a wayward camera setting to me.
Cheers--TE
__________________
TomEdgerton.com
"The dream drives the action."
--Thomas Berry, 1999
|
|
|
09-14-2004, 04:54 PM
|
#6
|
Juried Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Location: 8543-dk Hornslet, Denmark
Posts: 1,642
|
Red Rose reflected
Mike,
I like your pictures and admire your enthusiasm. It
|
|
|
09-14-2004, 06:16 PM
|
#7
|
SOG Member FT Professional '09 Honors, Finalist, PSOA '07 Cert of Excel PSOA '06 Cert of Excel PSOA '06 Semifinalist, Smithsonian OBPC '05 Finalist, PSOA
Joined: Mar 2004
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 1,445
|
Mike,
I love this series of pictures.
Regarding the colorful shot in the museum, what, if any enhancements did you make to this photo in Photoshop, before you sized it down and posted it above? I have the sense that you had to drastically lighten it in "Levels" or "Curves" beyond the digital forgiveness range. This is because I see jumpy, grainy color transitions, with some over-saturation. Was this photo much darker originally, with the metering being thrown off by the brightness of the window? This has happened to me a lot too.
I agree with Tom that tungsten lighting appears to dominate as the interior light source.
In general, are the pictures ready to use as exposed in your camera, or do you routinely adjust them before we see them? I guess I am trying to sense if there is a significant difference between the way a 2 year old Nikon D100 and a new Nikon D70 will interpret the same imagery. Typically my shots are slightly dark and underexposed (using -.03 exposure compensation) so I will better preserve the highlight information. But to share the photos, I usually need to brighten them up slightly first. In general, I get the sense that your camera handles highlights better than mine (just part of camera evolution, I guess).
Thanks for sharing these,
Garth
|
|
|
09-14-2004, 07:44 PM
|
#8
|
SENIOR MODERATOR SOG Member FT Professional, Author '03 Finalist, PSofATL '02 Finalist, PSofATL '02 1st Place, WCSPA '01 Honors, WCSPA Featured in Artists Mag.
Joined: Jun 2001
Location: Arizona
Posts: 2,481
|
Oh, yum, Mike these photos are like a candy shop! I'm not sure I am following your question about the bright yellow/gold/red - but in Photoshop CS, there is a feature under Image - Adjust -Photo filter.
You can choose a cool or warm filter which will give the overall image a hue shift that does approximate a change in Kelvin temp. However, when you shoot RAW imag, Nikon has a program called - (I forget, I'll look it up for you) which allows you go into a RAW image and change the white point after the fact. Is that cool or what?
Combined with using your level adjustments and other features, I think you may be able to turn that image into a great one. Personally, I never mind painting from a good black and white, in fact I think it's better to have no color at all than to continually fight bad color.
|
|
|
09-14-2004, 09:57 PM
|
#9
|
PHOTOGRAPHY MODERATOR SOG Member '03 Finalist Taos SOPA '03 HonMen SoCal ASOPA '03 Finalist SoCal ASOPA '04 Finalist Taos SOPA
Joined: Dec 2001
Location: Tulsa, Oklahoma
Posts: 2,674
|
To all who replied,
This colorful image is the result of much manipulation in my software. After much retro thinking I believe that I must not have used the spot meter. The photo, as taken, was very dark.
I don't think my initial analysis was well thought out regarding the resulting image, and I destroyed the original image in trying to get enough information out of it to show the composition here. I never considered that it would be usable.
It could well be that the garishness of the colors are partly the result of my manipulation. Although, those colors did exist. It was a very bold palette in that room. The camera was set to auto-white-balance and the only light in the room was window light.
I think that the bottom line is that I screwed up a good opportunity and I can't even come up with a good post mortum analysis because of my haste. Lesson learned.
Also, I really need to train myself to check my preview when I move from pose to pose and between different lighting conditions. With film I just jumped around dumb as a clam. I need to now take advantage of those things I have at my disposal.
Garth,
Quote:
In general, are the pictures ready to use as exposed in your camera
|
I would say yes.
However, my camera also presents images that are slightly too dark. I always lighten them up before presenting them here or printing them.
I had always heard that with digital cameras you had to be right on with the exposure because you could not correct up or down as much as with film. I don't find that to be the case with this camera. I am always amazed at how much information is there. Like the example I showed above of the one girl taken out of the very dark exposure. I got an 8x10 image printed of that today and it was amazingly good.
Also, the camera really picks up reflected color (maybe accurately) when color exists, like leaves or flowers. Below is an example of how the yellow / green leaves influenced the girls face when she was standing behind them. But, as in this closeup, there is a pretty good color rendition.
__________________
Mike McCarty
|
|
|
09-15-2004, 09:47 AM
|
#10
|
'09 Third Place PSOA Ohio Chapter Competition
Joined: Aug 2003
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 1,483
|
Mike, did you approach the museum to get permission to photograph your models there? What a great idea, what I could do in the cleveland museum!!!
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing this Topic: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:42 AM.
|