 |
09-30-2005, 10:02 AM
|
#1
|
SENIOR MODERATOR SOG Member FT Professional, Author '03 Finalist, PSofATL '02 Finalist, PSofATL '02 1st Place, WCSPA '01 Honors, WCSPA Featured in Artists Mag.
Joined: Jun 2001
Location: Arizona
Posts: 2,481
|
Hi Trisha,
There are a couple of things I notice: the master's cheekbone on our left, I think needs an entire value shift where the front of the face turns to become the side of the face. That plane change is not really vertical, it moves forward as it moves down the face.
I also think that you might integrate both figures' hairlines with the skin on the forehead/side of the face.The part in the disciple's hair might use some value shifts in order to make it appear more dimensional.
Trisha, check the drawing on the disciple's head. My impression is that there's not enough skull above the eyes.
Where will the title go?
|
|
|
09-30-2005, 03:51 PM
|
#2
|
Juried Member PT Professional
Joined: May 2004
Location: Americana, Brazil
Posts: 1,042
|
That's much better now, I think Chris has mentioned everything I would.
Fine job.
|
|
|
09-30-2005, 04:26 PM
|
#3
|
Juried Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Location: Byron Bay, Australia
Posts: 81
|
Thank you very much. This is wonderful feedback to work from.
Chris, the title will go above & beyond the painting's edge.
|
|
|
09-30-2005, 08:43 PM
|
#4
|
Juried Member
Joined: May 2004
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Posts: 281
|
Master of....?
Tricia, this is such an interesting painting that I must confess some curious ignorance here. I am fascinated to learn what the "Master" is a master of. Is this a Christian "master" as in Christ? You used the word "sadra". Is this a yoga or Hindu master or guru? A master of the guitar? Please quench my curiosity.
I may not sleep tonight should I not soon learn the answer.
Sleepless in Sun Lakes,
Carol Norton
|
|
|
10-01-2005, 01:40 AM
|
#5
|
Juried Member PT 5+ years
Joined: Nov 2001
Location: Stillwater, MN
Posts: 1,801
|
I
|
|
|
10-01-2005, 02:10 AM
|
#6
|
Juried Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Location: Byron Bay, Australia
Posts: 81
|
Thanks Steven.
I think my problem was in working from a B&W photo - for both men, and trying to wing a match for the light source using the forward man as the reference.
( not very clever am I !)
I did check my values by posterizing in Photoshop, but perhaps the camera lied in the original photo. The iris of the second man was shown that way in the photo. I knew it was strange wen painting it, but i didn't want to change the expression that the eye was giving us.
Never mind. I will try & do better next time.
Thank you all for taking the time to point out my errors here.
This is how i learn best.
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing this Topic: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:37 AM.
|