 |
09-14-2009, 09:26 AM
|
#1
|
Juried Member PT Professional
Joined: May 2004
Location: Americana, Brazil
Posts: 1,042
|
I second Laurel's words. I liked them both, but I think the new one works best for non-artists.
|
|
|
10-05-2009, 07:47 PM
|
#2
|
SOG Member
Joined: Aug 2003
Location: Southboro, MA
Posts: 1,028
|
Laurel & Claudemir --
Thanks for the feedback! that's helpful to know. . . I'm thinking I will start to use the new format at least for works as they are in progress...
http://www.terrificenec.com/wip/andrew.html
that way I can include comments for clients... Maybe once portraits are complete I can also include a the progression in table format for anyone who might be interested - the images are being loaded anyhow. . .
|
|
|
10-06-2009, 01:13 PM
|
#3
|
Ken Kaiser
Joined: Sep 2007
Location: North of Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 24
|
Hi Terri,
I just visited your site---very niceI. I have two very minor suggestions. For the works in progress section, maybe a little bit more time could be given to the various slide-show images that have a longer description below them. (It could be, though, that I am a slow reader!) The second suggestion involves the closeness of some of the lettering (e.g., Portraits in Oil) to the upper horizontal bar--could additional black background be inserted above these titles?
Ken
|
|
|
10-06-2009, 09:23 PM
|
#4
|
SOG Member
Joined: Aug 2003
Location: Southboro, MA
Posts: 1,028
|
hmmm... the 'slideshow' is set to run automatically when the page loads, but you can turn the slide show off, and flip the 'slides' manually whenever you're ready -- maybe that's not clear enough from the setup of the page? Should I change the Run/Stop and Previous/Next links to those little Pause & play type icons - would that be more user friendly?
I'll play with the spacing for the wording... thanks!
|
|
|
10-07-2009, 09:43 PM
|
#5
|
Juried Member
Joined: Apr 2009
Location: Saratoga Springs, UT
Posts: 143
|
Hey Terri,
Mostly I echo what's already been said so I'm not sure I have a lot to add, but I will say that my first inclination is to look for the play/pause buttons and arrow icons instead of the words. I also immediately look for them at the bottom of the image and when I didn't see them there, I didn't even realize I could scroll through (the one with the girl and her cat didn't automatically start the slideshow on my computer, but the one with the boy did). Anyway, seeing the arrows or icons at the bottom would have made me understand a little quicker than I did initially.
If that's a lot of work, and I built my website so I know these things take time, it may be best to keep it as is. Although it took me a minute to figure it out, I eventually did and enjoyed scrolling through your instructive and wonderfully rendered paintings. Well done!
|
|
|
10-13-2009, 02:39 AM
|
#6
|
SOG Member
Joined: Aug 2003
Location: Southboro, MA
Posts: 1,028
|
Thanks everyone for your input... Here's updated version taking into account feedback.
http://www.terrificenec.com/wip/andrew.html
The 'fade' feature (where the image gradually converts to the next) really only works in IE so depending on the browser you're using transitions might be more gradual or more abrupt... guess I'm wondering if people have a preference? Should I turn the fade off in IE?
|
|
|
10-13-2009, 11:17 AM
|
#7
|
Ken Kaiser
Joined: Sep 2007
Location: North of Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 24
|
Hi Terri,
Although I cannot see the fade feature, I do like the pause/play, forward, backward buttons. At least for me, these controls are very clear and easy to use.
Ken
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing this Topic: 2 (0 members and 2 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:44 AM.
|